Website designed around traditional hand made cheese with photos of people

Result #1

eating cheese in their native countries—including an American couple eating, one a young woman in a straw hat and the other a man in a straw hat and straw hat—was a good example of a successful exhibition. But more typical were the showstoppers: the low-tech, studio-quality paintings. The most compelling was the print prints of cheese with the words LE ZONE nśatě (The Zone) stenciled on it. The cheese was rendered in a patina of age, and the words are the names of countries where the cheese was produced—Czech, English, French, German, Italian, etc.

Result #2

from various places around the world, the exhibition was the product of a good year. Here, cheese, as it travels, becomes an emblem of international exchange, a form of instant cheap luxury. This is the globalized world of the average citizen, and it is this individualized globalization of the country that is its greatest strength. The exhibition was particularly well received, attracting a healthy crowd of curious onlookers.Cheeses Hidden Power was a fascinating experience. The exhibition presented an authentic experience, yet it offered many more questions than it had answers. We all know that cheese is cheap, and we know that it is often made from meat. In order to find out how cheese is made, and how it ends up in the supermarket, we must try to get some facts about it.

Result #3

Website designed around traditional hand made cheese with photos of people eating them as if they were the cheese of their fathers—this elicited a sense of intimacy between the cheese and the viewers. The entire sculpture was constructed in the same way: the form of the cheese, the shape of the cheese, the texture of the cheese, the history of cheese production and consumption, and the history of cheese production and consumption. The cheese was used as a sign of the individuals wish to partake of the sustenance of others, a desire expressed through food.The potential of cheese consumption is multifaceted. The term cheesecake refers to a desire for the sake of entertainment. A cheesecake is a formalized form of a female orgasm, a desire for the dissolution of the sexual barrier between man and woman. With the cheesecake, the sexual desires of men and women are one. The cheesecake has been a symbol of freedom since its origin in the eating of the male penis. The meaning of the cheesecake has changed over time, reflecting the rise of modernisms fascination with the desire of the modern individual to indulge in sexual liberation. In this sense, the cheesecake is a symbol of freedom and responsibility, of the desire to be an artist, to express ones thoughts, to participate in the life of the world, and to remain an individual.The exhibition offered a completely different perspective on the cheesecake through photography and sculpture. The photographs were of Léon Géricaults cheesecakes, taken in Paris in 1975, and presented on the walls of the Musée d'art moderne, with photographs of the sculptures and the cheesecakes in situ. The photographs were taken by Léon Géricault, who in 1973 became acquainted with the work of Jean Tinguely and Pierre Soulagess. He asked Géricault to be his assistants, and the two became acquainted through the same contact, both as artists and as artists, in their own work.

Result #4

enjoying the good life of the art gallery, shows the audience a glimpse of the artist. It is this audience, however, that is conspicuously absent in the video segment featuring the artist, which is also a video. The video is interrupted by a strange audio track that is taken from a radio broadcast in which a radio transmission of the same name, in a couple of different languages, is heard. The music is comprised of a piano recording of the voices of people on the telephone, a band of telephone operators who are seen speaking with the piano player, and other radio personality David Henry. In this segment the cheese is referred to as a cheese. The show at least holds together by the power of the cheese metaphor; it is a metaphor, though, that seems completely foreign to our cultural life.The video segments are not really a product of the artist; they are not meant to be. The video is only a device that can be used to document the action of the artist, and it is not an end in itself. In fact, it is more a means of collecting information than it is a commentary on the art world. The videos three segments are repetitive, so that they are about as effective as the cheese, and the gallery becomes the space for the exhibition. The final segment of the video, however, is about the art world. The footage is of a group of museum visitors who, having seen the cheese and having been asked what they think about it, decide that they like cheese, and that it is not an art commodity. The video is a sort of neo-cinema.The cheese was a universal sign of good taste. It was the first taste of good taste; it was the first taste in which the artist was invited to be a part. But isnt it about time we put an end to this? In the end, it is the cheese that is out of date.

Result #5

being photographed, with the accompanying text, is a clever and nonjudgmental interpretation of the cheese. The language is so simple that one can hardly understand the concepts being presented. It seems to me that the author was thinking of the cheese as an object of art, and he might have thought of its being, in the first place, as something one can possess and use as a sign of identity. The cheese-picker has the right to do as he wishes. It doesnt need to be related to any personal or social situation to be art.

©2024 Lucidbeaming