Shows knocked-out drunkards due to excessive drinking. Targets minors to not drink before their legal age

Result #1

Shows knocked-out drunkards due to excessive drinking. Targets minors to not drink before their legal age.Then there was the original. A guy who made a pretty good painting, giving the feeling of being able to paint whatever he wanted, but he didnt get the money for it. The reason was obvious enough: he wasnt painting a painting. He was making a decent painting but he didnt have any money to pay for it. He thought maybe he could sell it. Then he got the money and the painting is now hanging in a gallery. He doesnt have anything else to do, so hes putting it up on Craigslist. He sells the painting and now he has to find a way to get the money for it. He did some research and found out that anyone who offered to buy the painting wasnt interested. He then tried to sell the painting to a guy who didnt even have any money to pay for it. He turned around and found out that this is the guy who plays the game, the one who gets you in trouble. He tried to sell the painting to this guy who didnt even have a painting in his house. He tried to sell the painting to the guy who didnt even have money to pay for it, and now hes got a painting in his house.He got the painting, but he didnt have any money to pay for it. He didnt even have any painting in his house, and he figured that he couldnt get anything for it because hes got no credit history. So hes putting it up for bid, and hes got to pay for it. He does what hes supposed to do: he sells a painting, buys the right bidders, and resells it. But hes put his bid up to three times its asking price and hes still trying to sell it to these bidders. He puts the painting up for bid and the seller doesnt even bother to bid. He knows he wont get anything. Its a painting thats been sold to somebody else and he has to make do with it. He runs out of room in his studio.

Result #2

Shows knocked-out drunkards due to excessive drinking. Targets minors to not drink before their legal age. Yet, by painting the underage on-screen as the adult, Kiefer is also quoting Duchamps Sexual Labour, 1928–29, as well as a great many other painting–based pieces by the likes of the Impressionist Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, who used to criticize the painters relationship to the high art object. And the artist himself, the fashion-photographer Dave, also took a retrospective tour around the world, spending three months in Dubai in 2007 to make his show Kiefer in Dubai.But not everyone is a fan of the subject matter of Kiefer—and, in fact, he has made a name for himself in the Middle East and for the Middle East, and one sees signs of this in his works with the Jordanian-born, London-based artist Halil Altındere. But Altınderes collaboration with the artist Lili Leba, whose real name is Lili'Leba, raises issues with which the artist has been involved for quite a while. In this context, a narrative about a young girl, who has just been raped by a gang of men, becomes an allegory about the corruption of the Wests relationship with its Middle East neighbors. In this way, the exhibition is marked by Kiefers influence on Altınderes practice.The most recent work on display here is a video installation, The Journey, 2009. Kiefer filmed the artist and his wife on a journey through Iran. The work, which has been shown in several other installations, is a narrative in a second person that reveals an almost intimate aspect of the artist and his own life. Kiefer finds it difficult to express this in any other way than in a single voice, and this is why the installation is so mesmerizing. It is also a fascinating reflection on the Western fascination with the Middle East—with all its violence, repression, and conflict—and on the difficulty of communicating that interest.

Result #3

Shows knocked-out drunkards due to excessive drinking. Targets minors to not drink before their legal age, and they would be much better off. But their treatment is wrong, and not only because they are inebriated. They are, in fact, the wrong age—their age at their own age—and the resulting alcohol-induced insanity is already in progress. It is a calculated, calculated evil that destroys them, and that they do nothing about. To call it moral, then, is a blurring of boundaries.The moral implications of these images are complex. The subjects are recognizable; they are politicians, writers, and junkies. But what are they doing? They are participating in an established ritual. It is a ritual of conspicuous consumption, but one they are not supposed to be. The ritual is a seductive spectacle of sexual violence, and they are participating. They are not just passively numbly observing, but in a trance. They are participants in a ritualized, pathological sexual ritual, and the imagery is a real one. It shows their sexual aggression, but is it a conscious, or an unconscious, fact? The images are exaggerated, they are crudely painted, and they are crudely rendered. They do not depict real sexual violence, but a simulacrum of one. The images are not sexual images.They show up the social situation and its media image, but they do not represent it. They do not represent real sexual violence. They are not overtly public, but in fact are self-possessed. They are the wrong age, and they are inebriated. They are willing to follow a new, unconscious, ritual of consumption, but they are not.The photographs have the air of publicity, which is to say that they are, as in the press, too important to be revealed. They are important enough to be revealed, but not so important to be publicly understood. They are not representative. They are more interesting as art than as moral statements.

Result #4

. (A cop-cum-artist has been fired for failing to prevent underage drinking.) The San Francisco scene is a real mess, with alcohol being the most popular choice for the 21st-century snob. The artist, Mark Lombardi, is a consummate collector and collector, collecting everything from gun parts to tchotz, a characteristically tinged exuberance that his talent has earned him.

Result #5

Shows knocked-out drunkards due to excessive drinking. Targets minors to not drink before their legal age. The most horrific image, which, at a quick glance, looked like a classic schlock epic, is of a teenaged boy dressed in the worst of garb: his body is naked, standing in front of a starkly painted wall, where a tiny white cross—not a Nazi swastika—is superimposed over his naked bottom. The image is one of the most disturbing in the show. The image of a boy dressed in all black, covered in feces, and standing on the sidewalk, covered in feces, and bleeding from the mouth, is heartbreaking, yet oddly touching. The image, which has been reported that it was shot in a studio in Auschwitz, New York, also finds its way into the show, where it is apparently among the photographs that the Nazis used to mock the art of the ghetto. But the picture is not reproduced in the book. Rather, the Nazis used it to mock the painting of the ghetto and the existence of the gay community.The other two works in the show are photographs of the eye of a photographer. They are of young men in various stages of undress. The images, which were taken in the Düsseldorf fashion of the 50s, are romanticized. It is as if the photographs were of the naked, as opposed to the sexless, or the un-Photoshopped. It is as if the photos were a turn-of-the-century portrait of a typical German man. The two photographs are as similar as the other images. In the first, a man is shown from the waist up, with his face and crotch exposed. The middle-aged man standing behind the photographer is his back to the camera. The pose is that of a sexless erection. The two men are in the same position in a mirror. In the other, they are in a similar position, but the photographer is standing behind the mans head. The tension is mutual.