Humans think in stories rather than in facts, numbers or equations, and the simpler the story, the better. Every person, group and nation has its own tales and myths. But during the twentieth century the global elites in New York, London, Berlin and Moscow formulated three grand stories that claimed to explain the whole past and to predict the future of the entire world: the fascist story, the communist story, and the liberal story. The Second World War knocked out the fascist story, and from the late 1940s to the late 1980s the world became a battleground between just two stories: communism and liberalism. Then the communist story collapsed, and the liberal story remained the dominant guide to the human past and the indispensable manual for the future of the world or so it seemed to the global elite.

Result #1

Humans think in stories rather than in facts, numbers or equations, and the simpler the story, the better. Every person, group and nation has its own tales and myths. But during the twentieth century the global elites in New York, London, Berlin and Moscow formulated three grand stories that claimed to explain the whole past and to predict the future of the entire world: the fascist story, the communist story, and the liberal story. The Second World War knocked out the fascist story, and from the late 1940s to the late 1980s the world became a battleground between just two stories: communism and liberalism. Then the communist story collapsed, and the liberal story remained the dominant guide to the human past and the indispensable manual for the future of the world or so it seemed to the global elite.The Third World War changed all that. The global elite knew that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. They also knew that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. They were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. They were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. They were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. They were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. And they were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. They were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. And they were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. And they were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual. And they were convinced that the world was not only a battleground between two narratives, but that there were three dimensions to the world—the economic, the political and the spiritual.

Result #2

Humans think in stories rather than in facts, numbers or equations, and the simpler the story, the better. Every person, group and nation has its own tales and myths. But during the twentieth century the global elites in New York, London, Berlin and Moscow formulated three grand stories that claimed to explain the whole past and to predict the future of the entire world: the fascist story, the communist story, and the liberal story. The Second World War knocked out the fascist story, and from the late 1940s to the late 1980s the world became a battleground between just two stories: communism and liberalism. Then the communist story collapsed, and the liberal story remained the dominant guide to the human past and the indispensable manual for the future of the world or so it seemed to the global elite. In the late 1990s, the liberal story began to collapse, and the communist story came to dominate. By the early 2000s, the world was a battlefield between the liberal and the reactionary. The only thing left to the liberal was the liberal-capitalist divide.A number of works by the late 60s and 70s, most of them made between the late 60s and the early 70s, had been on view in the Bauhaus in Cologne. The works ranged from the heroic, like the mythological, like the historical, like the scientific, like the literary, like the symbolic, like the formal. In the Bauhaus, the works were displayed in three sections: history, science, and art.

Result #3

Humans think in stories rather than in facts, numbers or equations, and the simpler the story, the better. Every person, group and nation has its own tales and myths. But during the twentieth century the global elites in New York, London, Berlin and Moscow formulated three grand stories that claimed to explain the whole past and to predict the future of the entire world: the fascist story, the communist story, and the liberal story. The Second World War knocked out the fascist story, and from the late 1940s to the late 1980s the world became a battleground between just two stories: communism and liberalism. Then the communist story collapsed, and the liberal story remained the dominant guide to the human past and the indispensable manual for the future of the world or so it seemed to the global elite. Now, with the rapid spread of the internet, the global elite is no longer able to control the narrative of the past but can create new stories, which are also endlessly variable and open-ended. The global elite is now able to shape the world around them, and they can create new worlds.The new world is one that is neither fascist nor communist, but one that is neither a dictatorship nor a dictatorship. The new world is one in which the global elite is no longer able to control the narrative of the past nor control the narrative of the future. The new world is one in which the global elite can create new worlds, but not in a linear fashion. The world is not fixed in time and space, but in the moment.The new world is not a linear world, but one in which the global elite is no longer able to control the narrative of the past. The new world is not a linear world, but one in which the global elite can create new worlds, but not in a linear fashion. The world is not fixed in time and space, but in the moment. The world is not a linear world, but one in which the global elite can create new worlds, but not in a linear fashion. The new world is not a linear world, but one in which the global elite can create new worlds, but not in a linear fashion. The new world is not a linear world, but one in which the global elite can create new worlds, but not in a linear fashion. The world is not fixed in time and space, but in the moment. The world is not fixed in time and space, but in the moment. The world is not fixed in time and space, but in the moment. The world is not fixed in time and space, but in the moment. The new world is not a linear world, but one in which the global elite can create new worlds, but not in a linear fashion.

Result #4

Humans think in stories rather than in facts, numbers or equations, and the simpler the story, the better. Every person, group and nation has its own tales and myths. But during the twentieth century the global elites in New York, London, Berlin and Moscow formulated three grand stories that claimed to explain the whole past and to predict the future of the entire world: the fascist story, the communist story, and the liberal story. The Second World War knocked out the fascist story, and from the late 1940s to the late 1980s the world became a battleground between just two stories: communism and liberalism. Then the communist story collapsed, and the liberal story remained the dominant guide to the human past and the indispensable manual for the future of the world or so it seemed to the global elite. The new global world turned into a state of war, and the old world into a state of culture. With the help of the new global state, the old world was destroyed. The global elite were busy rebuilding the world, and the world became a new art. The new art, however, was based on the power of the new world, the new global state. And so on.The present exhibition, which was organized by the Institute for Contemporary Art, New York, and the Museu dArt Contemporani de Barcelona, brought together fifty-eight artists and intellectuals from all corners of the globe. The exhibition was organized by the Institute for Contemporary Art, New York, and the Museu dArt Contemporani de Barcelona, and included works by all those who lived and worked in the years before the end of the Cold War. The exhibition was organized in a chronological order that was based on a list of works by the artists who had come to the fore during the years leading up to the end of the Cold War.

Result #5

Humans think in stories rather than in facts, numbers or equations, and the simpler the story, the better. Every person, group and nation has its own tales and myths. But during the twentieth century the global elites in New York, London, Berlin and Moscow formulated three grand stories that claimed to explain the whole past and to predict the future of the entire world: the fascist story, the communist story, and the liberal story. The Second World War knocked out the fascist story, and from the late 1940s to the late 1980s the world became a battleground between just two stories: communism and liberalism. Then the communist story collapsed, and the liberal story remained the dominant guide to the human past and the indispensable manual for the future of the world or so it seemed to the global elite.The present is no longer a battleground between the two stories. The international media have been hijacked by the global elite for over a decade. The new globalist order is not only dominated by the global elite but is also dominated by the media. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around. The media are now the instrument of the global elite, not the other way around, and the media have become the instruments of the global elite, not the other way around.