At the scale of the infinitely small, quantum physics reveals an intriguing and mysterious phenomenon which makes us discover that two particles, whatever the distance which separates them, can be linked. They are not isolated, their states depend on each other. Physicists call this phenomenon "entanglement". In the macroscopic domain, does the world around us exist as it appears to us? Could it be that objects, subjects, distant from each other are also entangled? And if this entanglement did occur, how would it manifest itself? What might it look like? These images were made intuitively, without staging, independently of each other. Each one fixes an element of reality. As long as two photos are not united, these two elements are not linked. The diptych makes them meet and, like the images of two mirrors facing each other, puts in relation two dissociated realities.

Result #1

One can look at these images with a feeling of coherence, of being at the center of the world.The process of making the images was almost completely without planning. The images were made by the viewer. They were brought to him/her as they were found, in the midst of the collective movement of the mind. The process of the artists participation is not a process of commitment, but of accession to the world. The viewer becomes the maker of the images, to a certain extent. The works are not in themselves art, but the realization of the possibilities of the act of seeing.

Result #2

At the scale of the infinitely small, quantum physics reveals an intriguing and mysterious phenomenon which makes us discover that two particles, whatever the distance which separates them, can be linked. They are not isolated, their states depend on each other. Physicists call this phenomenon "entanglement". In the macroscopic domain, does the world around us exist as it appears to us? Could it be that objects, subjects, distant from each other are also entangled? And if this entanglement did occur, how would it manifest itself? What might it look like? These images were made intuitively, without staging, independently of each other. Each one fixes an element of reality. As long as two photos are not united, these two elements are not linked. The diptych makes them meet and, like the images of two mirrors facing each other, puts in relation two dissociated realities. It is as if the world were made up of two parts, the inner and the outer, and the two are inextricably linked.The first image, a group of nine, is an image of the sea. In the left-hand image, the ocean is suspended on a yellow line, while in the right-hand one, the sea is suspended on a red line. The bottom picture shows an ocean that is very small and very white; it is, in fact, the sea from a great distance, but the distance is just a little too small to be real. The sea, in the second image, is shown in a much larger format, and the small one in the right-hand image is in a much larger format. The bottom picture is a close-up of a very small blue and white ocean, and the top one is a much larger one, the color being so saturated as to make the water almost invisible. The ocean in the second image is a much larger one, and the one in the right-hand image is a much larger one. The one in the right-hand image is a much larger one, the color being so saturated as to make the water almost invisible. The ocean in the second image is a much larger one, and the one in the left-hand image is a much larger one. In both the second and the third images the ocean is seen in a much larger format, the distance between the two pictures reduced, and the colors become more saturated. The last image is a close-up of the same image as the first, but the one in the left-hand image is much larger. The bottom picture shows the ocean as seen from a great distance, but the one in the right-hand image is much smaller. The bottom picture shows the ocean as seen from a great distance, but the one in the right-hand image is much larger.

Result #3

At the scale of the infinitely small, quantum physics reveals an intriguing and mysterious phenomenon which makes us discover that two particles, whatever the distance which separates them, can be linked. They are not isolated, their states depend on each other. Physicists call this phenomenon "entanglement". In the macroscopic domain, does the world around us exist as it appears to us? Could it be that objects, subjects, distant from each other are also entangled? And if this entanglement did occur, how would it manifest itself? What might it look like? These images were made intuitively, without staging, independently of each other. Each one fixes an element of reality. As long as two photos are not united, these two elements are not linked. The diptych makes them meet and, like the images of two mirrors facing each other, puts in relation two dissociated realities. The mirror images are a form of identification, a way of communicating that is not a sign of social communication but rather a sign of the people who live together. As a result, the images are not images of each other but images of the people who live together. In this way, they become a visual metaphor for the relationship between the individual and society.The images are made of the same photographic paper, black and white, and the same image-text which is made up of the same images. The difference between the two images is that the one is made up of a large number of images, the other of a very small one. The question that arises is: what is the relationship between these two images? The image-text is a text, a representation of the image, while the image is a sign of the image. But what is the difference between the two? In the case of the diptych, the difference is that the large one is more important, and therefore more symbolic, whereas the smaller one, the one of the individual, is less symbolic and thus more important. As a result, the images, of the individual, are not only not connected by means of the sign but are also not connected by means of the sign. The images are in a state of contact. They are also not connected by means of the sign. The sign, which is a sign of the sign, is not only a tool, a signifier, but also a medium, a sign that is both a signifier and a sign of something. The signs, which are signs of something, are not only not connected by means of the sign but are also not connected by means of the sign. The sign is not a substitute for the sign. And the sign, which is not a sign, is not a substitute for the sign, which is a sign of something. In short, the sign is a substitute for the sign, not the sign.

Result #4

At the scale of the infinitely small, quantum physics reveals an intriguing and mysterious phenomenon which makes us discover that two particles, whatever the distance which separates them, can be linked. They are not isolated, their states depend on each other. Physicists call this phenomenon "entanglement". In the macroscopic domain, does the world around us exist as it appears to us? Could it be that objects, subjects, distant from each other are also entangled? And if this entanglement did occur, how would it manifest itself? What might it look like? These images were made intuitively, without staging, independently of each other. Each one fixes an element of reality. As long as two photos are not united, these two elements are not linked. The diptych makes them meet and, like the images of two mirrors facing each other, puts in relation two dissociated realities. The mirror, which holds the two images, is itself a mirror of the world. In this way, the two images are seen to be one and the same. The image of the mirror, which is also the image of the world, is the image of the world.The world is also seen to be in a state of dissolution. We are shown to be nothing but images of images, which are made to look as if they had disappeared into the world. The world is not only split up; it is divided up in two: one part, which we see as nothing but an image, is visible through the other part, which is also nothing but an image. The world is thus seen as a series of images, and the image of the world is the image of a world. This is where the show ends, for in this situation, the world is no longer a world of images, but a world of images in which images are no longer the dominant reality. In the end, the world is dissolved and the world is seen as a series of images. The world is no longer a world of images, but a world of images that dissolve images into one another, and thus make the two worlds indistinguishable. Thus, the world is no longer a world of images, but a world of images that dissolve images into one another. The world is thus no longer a world of images, but a world of images that dissolve themselves into one another. The world is thus no longer a world of images, but a world of images that dissolve themselves into one another. The world is thus no longer a world of images, but a world of images that dissolve themselves into one another. The world is thus no longer a world of images, but a world of images that dissolve themselves into one another. The world is thus no longer a world of images, but a world of images that dissolve themselves into one another.

Result #5

At the scale of the infinitely small, quantum physics reveals an intriguing and mysterious phenomenon which makes us discover that two particles, whatever the distance which separates them, can be linked. They are not isolated, their states depend on each other. Physicists call this phenomenon "entanglement". In the macroscopic domain, does the world around us exist as it appears to us? Could it be that objects, subjects, distant from each other are also entangled? And if this entanglement did occur, how would it manifest itself? What might it look like? These images were made intuitively, without staging, independently of each other. Each one fixes an element of reality. As long as two photos are not united, these two elements are not linked. The diptych makes them meet and, like the images of two mirrors facing each other, puts in relation two dissociated realities. We are left with the impression that, for the first time, all two elements are identical, that they are all alike in the abstract sense of the word. The world, however, is not in the world, but is in the world of images. The world of the photographs is not the world of the world; it is the world of the image.The second diptych shows two images, one a photograph of a man standing up, the other a photograph of a woman sitting down. The man is standing; the woman is seated. The world, however, is not in the world of images, but is in the world of images. The two images are not identical, but they are not identical in themselves. The man is a man; the woman is a woman. The world, however, is not in the world of images, but is in the world of images. The two images, then, are not identical in themselves, and yet they are not identical in themselves either. In the diptych, the man is standing and the woman is sitting, but they are not in the same place. The world, however, is not in the world of images, but is in the world of images. The two images, then, are not identical in themselves, and yet they are not identical in themselves either. In the diptych, the man is standing and the woman is sitting, but they are not in the same place. The world, however, is not in the world of images, but is in the world of images. The two images, then, are not identical in themselves, and yet they are not identical in themselves either. In the diptych, the man is standing and the woman is sitting, but they are not in the same place. The world, however, is not in the world of images, but is in the world of images.