The pen plotter serves as a contemporary counterpart to the artist's hand, a conduit through which digital algorithms manifest as tangible works of art. This functions as a devirtualisation of generative image making - ink marks that mimic handcrafted precision from afar but unravel into digital intricacies up close. Text is hidden in the drawings, opposing the context of the images presented. The word "learn" is hidden in an image of a schoolgirl slacking off.
The pen plotter serves as a contemporary counterpart to the artist's hand, a conduit through which digital algorithms manifest as tangible works of art. This functions as a devirtualisation of generative image making - ink marks that mimic handcrafted precision from afar but unravel into digital intricacies up close. Text is hidden in the drawings, opposing the context of the images presented. The word "learn" is hidden in an image of a schoolgirl slacking off.In a separate room, a group of drawings titled The Good Life, 2016, demonstrated how the artist's hand could be used as a digital substitute for the hand. The drawings on display were created using a machine that can scan a drawing in a variety of formats, including pastels, charcoal, and graphite. The paper and pencil drawings are then printed on canvas, and the result is a series of monochromatic monochrome abstractions. The pencil-and-pencil drawings are printed on paper, which is then bound and framed. In some cases, the paper is printed so that only black and white parts are visible. This process produces a complex, irregular, and unevenly shaped drawing. The black and white paper has an almost sterile quality, like a primer. The colored areas are drawn from the same source as the black-and-white drawings. The resulting drawings are more complex and less unified than the pencil-and-pencil drawings, and their subject matter is more detailed. The paper is bound together with a single, long thread. The drawing is also longer than the canvas, which is bound with a single thread. The pen-and-pencil drawings are bound with a single thread, and the result is a single drawing, a grid, and a series of images.In a group of eight drawings titled The Good Life, 2016, the pencils and ink on display seemed to refer to the artist's hand. The drawings were all about the relationship of hand to body, and the pencil is a kind of body part that also serves as a body part. The pencil is a hand and a body part that together form a body. The ink is a hand and a body part that also serves as a body part. The pencil and pencil drawings allude to the relationship between hand and body, hand and body. The pencil and pencil drawings allude to the relationship between hand and body, hand and body.
The pen plotter serves as a contemporary counterpart to the artist's hand, a conduit through which digital algorithms manifest as tangible works of art. This functions as a devirtualisation of generative image making - ink marks that mimic handcrafted precision from afar but unravel into digital intricacies up close. Text is hidden in the drawings, opposing the context of the images presented. The word "learn" is hidden in an image of a schoolgirl slacking off.The works also reflect the artists process, which involves using a variety of media to create a single composition. For instance, in the work titled Image: A Study of the Human Face, 2009, the artist drew a human face from a photo album and created a composite by tracing the contours of the contour of the face, using a brush to make the contours of the face, then trace the contours of the image. The result is a single, unified image. The last two works are much more complex, in that they involve the use of a variety of photographic and digital techniques to create a single composite. The first is titled Image: A Study of the Human Face, 2009, and the second is titled Image: A Study of the Human Face, 2009. Here the artist drew a composite of three different photographs of the same face. Each composite is comprised of a single photographic image, the contours of the face from the first composite are traced over the contours of the second composite and the third composite. The result is a single image, each of which is a composite of three different photographs. The result is an image composed of three distinct parts, each part a composite of three different parts. The same image is repeated three times.The digital-age work also includes a hidden element: the letter U, which appears as a sort of key to the works. Each of the works contains an image that is digitally reproduced, in the form of a letter in a font on the wall. The letter U is an image that the artist has created digitally and then printed onto a surface. The letter U appears as a sort of key in the work. The letter U is the key to the works. The key is what gives the works their power. The key is what keeps the works from becoming mere things, as the title of the exhibition, HAPPY BIRTHDAY, 2012, suggests.
The pen plotter serves as a contemporary counterpart to the artist's hand, a conduit through which digital algorithms manifest as tangible works of art. This functions as a devirtualisation of generative image making - ink marks that mimic handcrafted precision from afar but unravel into digital intricacies up close. Text is hidden in the drawings, opposing the context of the images presented. The word "learn" is hidden in an image of a schoolgirl slacking off. An image of a black-and-white photograph is partially obscured by a red blur. The word "dance" is hidden in a photograph of a young girl wearing a miniskirt and holding a pair of sunglasses. The word "read" is hidden in a photograph of a boy reading a book. The word "scan" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy sitting on a bench reading a book. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy staring at a computer screen. A photograph of a woman wearing a white cap holds a book, while a photograph of a woman in a pink dress stares at the camera. The words "see, hear, or hear are hidden in an image of a boy playing with a toy gun. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a boy with a gun. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy reading a book. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy sitting on a bench reading a book. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy staring at a computer screen. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy playing with a toy gun. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy wearing a miniskirt and holding a pair of sunglasses. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy sitting on a bench reading a book. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy sitting on a bench reading a book. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy staring at a computer screen. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy sitting on a bench reading a book. The word "scanner" is hidden in a photograph of a young boy sitting on a bench reading a book.
The pen plotter serves as a contemporary counterpart to the artist's hand, a conduit through which digital algorithms manifest as tangible works of art. This functions as a devirtualisation of generative image making - ink marks that mimic handcrafted precision from afar but unravel into digital intricacies up close. Text is hidden in the drawings, opposing the context of the images presented. The word "learn" is hidden in an image of a schoolgirl slacking off.In her second solo exhibition, the artist presented a suite of oil paintings based on the same abstracting and mutating algorithms. The paintings, all untitled, are inked on canvas, and are based on the same code—a series of overlapping circles and rectangles that have been cropped and manipulated to resemble human features. In one, for example, the circles are enlarged to the point where the middle of the image is painted black, while in another, the reds and greens are treated to resemble human hair.The images are crudely drawn, with a smudged, dirty, and smeared surface. The artist suggests that the paintings are based on a childs drawing, and that they are a sort of public performance. The artist creates an alternate history, where the images are more precious than real. A work that uses the same image in multiple variations, one that is completely covered with black ink and another one that is partially covered, is an allegory of the double bind of the digital age.The paintings are based on the same algorithm, but with the added twist of being able to perform an act of self-mutilation. A ring of black circles made from black ink and red-brown paint is made to look like a hand and a finger, as if to suggest the potential of the hand to mutate. The circles and rectangles, and the circles and rectangles that are drawn, are rendered with a smudged, smeared, and smeared surface. The black circles are so small as to be almost invisible, while the red circles are so large as to be almost impossible to read. The result is a kind of nightmare that evokes the history of art. The black circles are circular, while the red circles are square. The black circles and the red ones are covered with black ink, while the red ones are entirely covered with black ink.
The pen plotter serves as a contemporary counterpart to the artist's hand, a conduit through which digital algorithms manifest as tangible works of art. This functions as a devirtualisation of generative image making - ink marks that mimic handcrafted precision from afar but unravel into digital intricacies up close. Text is hidden in the drawings, opposing the context of the images presented. The word "learn" is hidden in an image of a schoolgirl slacking off. The word that appears in the lower-right corner of the drawing is the word that appears in the upper-right corner: in other words, the computer. By taking the pen as its model, the artist can translate his own hand into an aesthetic system. In this case, the artist can turn the work into a physical representation of his own creative process, a kind of image-language synthesis. This is the subject of his latest series of drawings, titled Computer Image Series. The paintings of these images are made up of a grid of two- or three-dimensional lines, with the smallest line being the first line. The artist draws the first line from the beginning, then repeats the process, until the last line is drawn. In this way, the computer generates the images.The drawings are made up of two- or three-dimensional lines, and the artist draws the first line from the beginning, then repeats the process, until the last line is drawn. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images. In this way, the computer generates the images.
©2024 Lucidbeaming