Good presentation. I think the presentation is clear and the background of both artist and the idea behind is very detailed. Maybe can mention more about how the background of the artist triggered him to do the creation, and if there is any message behind the artwork collections. vernacular art, as it is usually thought of, is mostly

Result #1

out of sight and out of mind, and this one is an exception. It is difficult for outsiders to grasp that a new revelation is being made, or that a new revelation is being unleashed in the world, or that the world is developing into a new, vital energy. The art is always a series of recurring, small events, so that when the events are no longer in the present they are gone. Most of these events are visual, in fact they are inconceivably beautiful; they are accompanied by a novel, and we look at them as if they were nothing but images. These objects are transformed into images, so that when we see an image it is like seeing a dream. Since the images are images, then, that image is truly the power. Once we have seen an image, all we need to do is look at it, and it is all that is left for us to do. This image is reality, a tangible reality, and reality is truth.

Result #2

Good presentation. I think the presentation is clear and the background of both artist and the idea behind is very detailed. Maybe can mention more about how the background of the artist triggered him to do the creation, and if there is any message behind the artwork collections. vernacular art, as it is usually thought of, is mostly made of bare canvas and used with special attention to the effects of color. It is like a dog sitting on a block of soap that has been dipped in warm-brown paint and left to dry before being cast in metal.Mamoli has been associated with such precocious groups as the Nude Division, the Deadheads, and the Neo-Dada Art Movement. She has also produced some interesting combinations of methods. The masterful use of stasis and the opticality of her old industrial artifacts is based on the idea that the background is both the focus and the distortion of the image. This has been a key element in her art since the 80s. Her early stasis pieces with heavy bands of color, and later works with more deceptively beautiful ornaments, like the nose pieces, are the result of a gradual adjustment of her invention to her new visual environment. The paintings have the feeling of being made out of thickly applied acrylics. She has added an experimental effect to her old antique machinery. As well, she has chosen new materials for her new works: polyurethane foam rubber, vinyl, and wood. Her stasis pieces are less striking in that their colors are less than clear. Mami has used these materials in unusual and original ways, and she has drawn attention to the physical properties of them. She has not used her materials to build an image but to create something.Mami, like many artists, has embraced a new medium: ceramics. She has chosen an earlier, softer, natural material for the background of her works. Mami does not often use oil paint but a fairly strong basic red, orange, and yellow medium. The works are not as ornate as her earlier pieces but they are considerably less hazardous. In some of the new works Mami has also used white to reinforce her paintings. These new works are relatively clean and elegant.

Result #3

designed for performance. It is not meant to be decorative. I am not sure, but I think it is. vernacular art is a way of communicating.It is not difficult to understand why Janis favors one style over another. If it were, one style would not be so popular. vernacular art is a way of communicating; but the communication style is no communication style. The communication style is artistic communication. In Janis art, the communication style is an entirely art-like style.The art of Janis is all art, art not designed for the viewing audience. Janis art, in fact, is a very sophisticated art, in which art is learned and presented. The art is so sophisticated that it is hard to say what Janis art means. Do you think of it as art that you think of art? Is it art that you think of art? Janis art is so sophisticated that its impossible to understand. As he explains, it is as complicated as I thought possible to understand art.

Result #4

Good presentation. I think the presentation is clear and the background of both artist and the idea behind is very detailed. Maybe can mention more about how the background of the artist triggered him to do the creation, and if there is any message behind the artwork collections. vernacular art, as it is usually thought of, is mostly useless art. If art and art history are to be helpful, we need to consider art history in the context of both artists and their ideas. In this article, Marden wrote that he did not try to make a realistic, or historically accurate, or, more precisely, an ethically informed, painting. And although he tried to achieve the naturalistic, he was never successful. He is a firm believer in the accuracy of the image. He goes on to say that he was not concerned about whether the image looked good. He wanted to make the painting.Marden represents a far cry from his earlier work. His paintings of the 80s showed a great deal of transformation and revelation, which now is apparent in the new works. Here is the new transformation, this time for the human body, now for nature: the transformation of the body into a painting of a world. The body is transformed into a painting. The painting is transformed into a painting of a world, that world being nature. And the paintings are pictures of the earth. They are pictures of a world that is not on earth. We see here a world whose unity is not present in nature, but, on the contrary, has been achieved in the painting. Marden shows us how the picture world is divided in two: one layer is still and solid, the other has been destroyed by the pictures or painted with incredible density. The former layer is like a huge mortar wall; the latter a crescent shaped mountain in the process of growth. In the former, the surface is soft; in the latter, hard. The latter is an age of war; in the former, the surface is alive and solid, in the latter, its growth has been disturbed. Marden shows us how the picture world is no longer in unity with nature, but is not a unity with the world of mankind but is an agglomeration of chaos.

Result #5

your mother. There is no dearth of high quality art, and its a rather elaborate and self-consciously self-confident world—much too rich in possibilities and not yet in the shape of the universe. There is, however, a saying, in the Quarterly, that you dont try to kill the fish in the sea—you try to make the world better than it is, make it happy. This is a kind of petty world view. The richness of this world is extraordinary, but its great—it must have been a lot of work to make it. Or it must have been a lot of work to make it, and probably lots of effort. But you dont have to know it. In that kind of world, its hardly worth your time. Albert Einstein once said, You can make the world a good idea and a bad idea at the same time, and that is what makes this world a good idea. Delicate things are usually the result of lots of effort.