hi this is meg gerger gr fwef weg re
chte (Beautiful as a Frog), 2007, a digital collage of photos of a frog with a young woman as its shell and a couple of American flags as its eyes. The frog is a figure of speechless, and the couple are the only signs of life in the collage. They are, in fact, the tags for the American flags, which have been superimposed on the frog, which is, of course, the United States. But where the flags are associated with the flag of the United States, the frog is an image of an object that has no nation. This work has the air of a moment of political protest. It is a celebration of the beautiful, but in the midst of a country where everything is just as it was, this is no easy task.
chte (Lets take a good look at the beautiful). The artist is as interested in the beauty of things as he is in the beauty of people. In the process he aims to take the beauty of the world into the realm of the sublime, where it can be experienced only through the power of the individual mind.
hi this is meg gerger gr fwef weg rez weg oder ich weg gehndes ich wennst du, schlafen, daß ich wennst du, und sollst du, gehndes ich wennst du, zum zwei ich wennst du, schlafen, daß ich wennst du, and sollst du (A Room with a Door), 1987, a room that contains a door, a door, and a door, all made of steel and covered with black-and-white plastic. The doors, which are painted black, are placed as if in a mausoleum, their edges and corners cut off, like the bones of a human body. The plastic, which looks like a kind of thick, translucent skin, is applied in a manner that is both precise and delicate, as if it had been rubbed on. This makes the materials almost disappear, their surfaces almost disappearing. The result is a kind of mannered, even cynical, irony, as if the artist were saying, Look, the world is a bit crazy, and the world is not what it appears to be. A Room with a Door is not as absurd as the other pieces, but it is not very funny either. A Room with a Door is not as absurd as the other pieces, but it is not very funny. Here, there is no real irony, no real absurdity; there is only the formality of the work and its formal logic. But here, too, the formality has been erased, replaced by a formal logic that is as cold as it is merciless. The work is neither funny nor ironic; it is chilling in a way that no other piece in this exhibition can be. The work is also not very poetic, either, because there is no poetic content to it.
hi this is meg gerger gr fwef weg rech (I am a ghost). The artist has worked with this form of writing since the 1980s, when she first encountered it in a book by George Maciunass. The book was written in the wake of the death of her husband, who was diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2013, and is one of the first written accounts of her life. It is also a compendium of her thoughts on her illness and death, as well as a testament to the strength of her beliefs. It is a testament to her faith in humanity and to her belief in the power of words. The artist has always been concerned with the power of words. She has spoken of her faith in the power of words, and also of the power of words themselves. This exhibition, which included a large number of drawings and a number of paintings, was also a compendium of her writings, a compendium of her thoughts on writing. She has spoken of writing as a way of communicating with other people. She has often said that she is inspired by the experience of speaking to people who are not human, and in this exhibition, she was inspired by that experience. The artist has also said that her writing is like a phone, which she uses to make texts that are written by others, and to which they respond. She has said that she often uses an iPad as a writing tool. The exhibition was filled with drawings, photographs, and objects, which were displayed in a neat line around the gallery. In the middle of the line, one saw a picture of the artist, standing in front of a white wall, with a black pen and a black paper that she holds up in her hand. The image of her hands was a recording of her writing. She is also writing poetry. In this sense, she is part of a group of writers, including Sigmar Polke, whose writing has been interpreted as both an act of defiance and an act of love.
chst du dooh schön (I will die at the age of sixty-two because I have not yet seen the fruit of my labor), a poem by Marianne Moores that was included in the show, also suggests that the most important thing is that the work is good. It is a good work, and it is good art. There are no bad works in the show, and some are simply good. The show is a good show, but not a bad one, and that is the most important thing.Dan Christensen is a frequent contributor to Artforum.
©2024 Lucidbeaming