Describe the work in as much detail as you can. (What is happening in the scene? What is the palette? etc.) Next, how do you think the artist created a sense of unity/harmony into the work? Similarly, describe all of the ways you see variety employed in the work. Lastly, how is the work balanced? Be specific. (For ex, if the work is asymmetrically balanced, tell me how the artist has gone about balancing the "visual weight" of the composition)

Result #1

Describe the work in as much detail as you can. (What is happening in the scene? What is the palette? etc.) Next, how do you think the artist created a sense of unity/harmony into the work? Similarly, describe all of the ways you see variety employed in the work. Lastly, how is the work balanced? Be specific.

Result #2

Describe the work in as much detail as you can. (What is happening in the scene? What is the palette? etc.) Next, how do you think the artist created a sense of unity/harmony into the work? Similarly, describe all of the ways you see variety employed in the work. Lastly, how is the work balanced? Be specific. (For ex, if the work is asymmetrically balanced, tell me how the artist has gone about balancing the "visual weight" of the composition) And remember, I dont want to read too much into the final product. (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.) (You can always make the final product look like you did.

Result #3

Describe the work in as much detail as you can. (What is happening in the scene? What is the palette? etc.) Next, how do you think the artist created a sense of unity/harmony into the work? Similarly, describe all of the ways you see variety employed in the work. Lastly, how is the work balanced? Be specific.

Result #4

Describe the work in as much detail as you can. (What is happening in the scene? What is the palette? etc.) Next, how do you think the artist created a sense of unity/harmony into the work? Similarly, describe all of the ways you see variety employed in the work. Lastly, how is the work balanced? Be specific. (For ex, if the work is asymmetrically balanced, tell me how the artist has gone about balancing the "visual weight" of the composition) ezc If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction. (If you want to get technical, the best way to get technical about the work is to describe its actual construction.

Result #5

Describe the work in as much detail as you can. (What is happening in the scene? What is the palette? etc.) Next, how do you think the artist created a sense of unity/harmony into the work? Similarly, describe all of the ways you see variety employed in the work. Lastly, how is the work balanced? Be specific. (For ex, if the work is asymmetrically balanced, tell me how the artist has gone about balancing the "visual weight" of the composition) alden This last question is the most important one. Theres a real balance to the work, but not an easy one to find. (The artist is constantly shifting the balance of the composition.) (The artist has a habit of changing the balance of the composition. (He usually goes from the same weight to the same weight.) (He always has a plan.) (He always has an idea.) (He always has a plan. ) (He always has an idea.) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea. ) ) (He always has an idea. ) (He always has an idea.