if this is permanent, yet generative, does it suggest it is inevitable?

Result #1

if this is permanent, yet generative, does it suggest it is inevitable? The artist, however, seems to have responded to the situation by exhibiting in a different medium. He then exhibited his drawings in a museum, which may have been a bit too much for the artist to handle. These drawings, which are a bit too rough in execution and not always legible, were shown in the art center of the Kunstakademie Düsseldorf. Here, the artist had to face the fact that the drawings werent the same as his previous drawings. The artist had to decide what to do with this knowledge, and, in doing so, he had to deal with the fact that the drawings, which were made on an analog typewriter, were also drawings in the sense of the analog typewriter. In this case, the artist had to decide between making the drawings as drawings and making the drawings as drawings. The decision was a simple one: to make the drawings as drawings, and to make the drawings as drawings. In other words, the artist made drawings and exhibited them in the gallery. This was an ideal situation, since the gallery was the most accessible and, therefore, the most accessible to the public. But this was not so easy. The gallery is designed for the display of art, and the artist had to choose between the two modes of display, which were not necessarily antithetical, but, rather, complementary. The artist had to decide whether to show the drawings or the drawings. The gallery had a long, narrow space, which allowed the viewer to walk around and among the drawings, and at the same time allowed the artist to show them in a more or less comfortable position, which was particularly important in the case of the drawings, which were displayed on a low pedestal, facing the wall. The gallery space, which is the same as the artist, had to be the same as the drawings, which were placed on an easel.

Result #2

Or is it just a manifestation of the artists own mood? The book is a testament to the creativity of the artist. And, indeed, it is a testament to his ability to remain in the present moment, to be present.

Result #3

In a sense, then, the important thing is not what is there, but what is not there. It is not the place of the artist to make a painting, or even the place of the gallery to present it.

Result #4

—Johanna Burton

Result #5

Is it the end of an era or simply an abrupt end? Theres always a pause and a break, and even when the work is not finished, its always there, on the other side, ready to be reworked.