Uh so my art is a rough pencil sketch not the best outlines the hair is a rough long length covering one of the eye completely the other eye Is like first draw a slanting line and ad dot to to it sith a buttoned nose and line for lips the clothes is a normal t-shirt with heavy sleeves and hands at the back and the pant is flown at the end hiding the shoes

Result #1

Uh so my art is a rough pencil sketch not the best outlines the hair is a rough long length covering one of the eye completely the other eye Is like first draw a slanting line and ad dot to to it sith a buttoned nose and line for lips the clothes is a normal t-shirt with heavy sleeves and hands at the back and the pant is flown at the end hiding the shoes <|startoftext|>One of the more interesting ways in which the art world operates, ironically, is in the manner in which we dress up and decorate. On the one hand, we have the art world suggesting that the more interesting art is the more interesting and fashionable, and the more interesting the more chic. On the other hand, we have the art world insisting that the more interesting art is the more interesting and fashionable, and the more fashionable the more chic. In fact, clothes as decor are pretty much the same as art, but not necessarily as interesting. Even the most fashionable and polished of clothes has to look pretty basic in the way that the least used or most specialized ones must. So how do we tell the difference? Because, like clothes, they have to look pretty basic, and they do. So dress up like a poor little thing and youll be satisfied; or maybe, better, because clothes are poor little things and generally the most interesting things are. And so, like clothes, you dress up like a rich little thing and youll be uncomfortable; or maybe, better, because clothes are poor little things and generally the most interesting things are.Hannah Ylens recent work deals with two very different kinds of clothes, both of which are much more interesting than they appear to be. A first, a kind of basic one, is the kind of brightly patterned, all-over floral design that we see in so many American, European, and Latin American modernist-type design movements in the 60s, 70s, and 80s.

Result #2

Uh so my art is a rough pencil sketch not the best outlines the hair is a rough long length covering one of the eye completely the other eye Is like first draw a slanting line and ad dot to to it sith a buttoned nose and line for lips the clothes is a normal t-shirt with heavy sleeves and hands at the back and the pant is flown at the end hiding the shoes to the end in a grid of four vertical stripes that dot the floor and edges in a circle extending out in a diagonal right angle.Once you got through all this, you realized that the work was a series of different drawings. The work was comprised of four small-format, three-color drawings. The fourth, a photograph, was a larger, four-color work from a range of different combinations, some more than others. In each case the drawings were taken on paper, some with pencil and some with paint. The colors were close to those that the artist was familiar with. A photographer would have to know the difference between those two sorts of colors. The drawings themselves were one color, so in this case they were different in significance. They were all the same size and were all done with the same paint. Each was the same size but different in the manner in which it was painted. The colors were painted in a wide, lazy palette of dull gray tones. The paint was applied with a brush that was so thin that it was almost invisible. However, it made the drawing look like a page from a book. The point of contact between the paint and the paper was more like a tattoo.One of the drawings consisted of a pen line drawn across the paper. The pen line was the same size as the paint in the drawing, just a quarter inch less than the paint. The pen line was applied in such a way that it was almost as if the pen had just scratched the paper. The pen line was reminiscent of the back and side and neck lines of the American Indian. It was also reminiscent of the works of Dara Birnbaum and artists of the West Coast and San Francisco Art Institute. It was the least successful part of the show. The pen line was a nice idea, but it wasnt as interesting as the drawings. In the drawings the pen line seemed to be even more involved than in the drawings.

Result #3

<|startoftext|>Another of the current young New York artists to make a big show in New York, this time at the Walker Art Center, is Cinzas, a multi-media artist who attended the University of Chicago and then moved to New York City. Cinzas is far from the wall-bound, the restrained, print-on-cushion, pack-and-shoe master of his statement that he is, a wall-bound sculptor. He uses a variety of materials such as wood, rope, lead, feathers and plaster and is adept at depicting the social and psychological attitudes of his surroundings. His use of ropes to hold his work in place on the floor is funny, and his ability to make his plaster-and-lead objects float in the air is impressive. Cinzas projects his work with a sense of drama, a sharp eye for detail and a keen sense of how to use these materials. He is a consummate craftsman who makes as many of his objects as possible, to be displayed and exhibited at a time when it is necessary to have something to show for everything.

Result #4

Uh so my art is a rough pencil sketch not the best outlines the hair is a rough long length covering one of the eye completely the other eye Is like first draw a slanting line and ad dot to to it sith a buttoned nose and line for lips the clothes is a normal t-shirt with heavy sleeves and hands at the back and the pant is flown at the end hiding the shoes <|startoftext|>Lily Allen recently moved to a new home on the East River in Brooklyn. In her new position she is in the process of transforming her former studio into an exhibition space. In addition to allowing the artist to work in a secluded space she is also expanding her practice into the gallery environment. The floor and walls are covered in a thin layer of yellow acrylic paint. On two large canvases she has used the color to create the elements of a scene. Her drawings are connected by lines in a similar way to the pencil sketches. In these new works the blue, yellow, and black paint have been applied directly on the canvas, and the resulting surface is polished to look like polished glass. The paintings are considered sculptures in the same way as the pastel sculptures were. Instead of being framed by the glass surface, they are printed onto the surface. The transition from two-dimensional to three-dimensional is gradual and difficult. Throughout the exhibition, the artists new work gives the viewer a good sense of the way in which she is transforming her former practice.The work in this show was done between September 2 and September 17. The main part of the show was devoted to the transformations of the canvas, with the two large works from the series Beauty & Burden. The series consists of two boxes with transparent plastic sides containing secret vials containing various liquids—teaspoons, formica balls, and liquid soap. The boxes and vials are the products of Allan, who discovered that she could manipulate the material, turning it into something new and new only with the assistance of other artists. The drawings are illustrations for the containers. In these examples, the transparent plastic has been sanded and sanded with the same paint as the vials. The result is objects that look like the finished products of the artist. While the various colored and over-printed parts of the canvases are present, they are only sketched.

Result #5