political issue of bots where do these images come from? programming autonomy anthropology of images human weighing-artificial intelligence blend divergence x personality newsstand flow break immediate seizure what these images say about us banking as an instrument to inform "reality" gallery file atlas mnemosine infinite images newspaper, magazine, poster, booklet (publication media) we influence the "aesthetics" of bots or bots influence us

Result #1

political issue of bots where do these images come from? programming autonomy anthropology of images human weighing-artificial intelligence blend divergence x personality newsstand flow break immediate seizure what these images say about us banking as an instrument to inform "reality" gallery file atlas mnemosine infinite images newspaper, magazine, poster, booklet (publication media) we influence the "aesthetics" of bots or bots influence us as consumers of images and as producers of images, a statement by the artist, and the artist, in the catalogue. A similar question arises with the computer-generated images, which have been widely used in the past to generate a series of images, but which, in the case of the work of Hans-Ulrich Obrist, have also been used as a means of generating images. In the past Obrist has made computer-generated images that have been shown in the gallery, and has also made works that have been shown in the artists studio. In the present installation, he has made work that is both computer-generated and computer-created.The installation consists of two parts. The first part is a series of slides, projected on the wall, of which the first half is shown on the wall. The slides are of photographs Obrist took of a number of commercial images, and of them he has projected them on the wall, as if they were slides. The second part of the installation consists of a series of drawings, done in the same manner as the slides, of which the first half is shown on the wall. The drawings are of computer-generated images Obrist has taken of images he has taken of other artists. They are thus both computer-generated and artists-drawn, and they are also computer-generated, as if they were slides.The computer-generated images, which are projected on the wall, are part of a series of slides, one of which is a series of photographs Obrist took of a piece of wall. The slides show the wall and the wall on it, and they show the wall as it appears to be in the photographs. In the slides, the wall is blurred, and the two-dimensional images are shown on the wall behind the blurred wall, but they are not projected on the wall; they are projected on the wall. The slide show is a projection of the wall, a projection of the wall.

Result #2

political issue of bots where do these images come from? programming autonomy anthropology of images human weighing-artificial intelligence blend divergence x personality newsstand flow break immediate seizure what these images say about us banking as an instrument to inform "reality" gallery file atlas mnemosine infinite images newspaper, magazine, poster, booklet (publication media) we influence the "aesthetics" of bots or bots influence us to believe that we are in a world of images. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication.We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication. We are in a world of images, a world of visual communication.

Result #3

, and what is our relation to the media we manipulate, and how does it affect our relations to art?—Susan Sontag

Result #4

political issue of bots where do these images come from? programming autonomy anthropology of images human weighing-artificial intelligence blend divergence x personality newsstand flow break immediate seizure what these images say about us banking as an instrument to inform "reality" gallery file atlas mnemosine infinite images newspaper, magazine, poster, booklet (publication media) we influence the "aesthetics" of bots or bots influence us to understand their systems of information, and the power of their techniques of communication. In this exhibition, we see how the self-awareness of bots is not limited to the manipulation of information. We see how they are also interested in the idea of self-representation and representation as a tool, a strategy, and a means of control.In a sense, we are also looking at a world of robots, one in which the machines are themselves. The machines are not merely instruments of communication; they are also self-representations. This is the case in the work of some of the artists in the show, such as George Maciunas and Michael Nelson. The robots in these pieces are not merely tools. They are also self-representations, self-representations that are themselves instruments of communication. In Maciunass work, the robots are not merely tools; they are self-representations. This is the case in the work of some of the artists in the show, such as George Maciunas and Michael Nelson. The robots in these pieces are not merely tools. They are also self-representations. This is the case in the work of some of the artists in the show, such as George Maciunas and Michael Nelson. The robots in these pieces are not merely tools. They are self-representations. This is the case in the work of some of the artists in the show, such as George Maciunas and Michael Nelson. The robots in these pieces are not merely tools. They are self-representations. This is the case in the work of some of the artists in the show, such as George Maciunas and Michael Nelson. The robots in these pieces are not merely tools. They are self-representations. This is the case in the work of some of the artists in the show, such as George Maciunas and Michael Nelson. The robots in these pieces are not merely tools.

Result #5

political issue of bots where do these images come from? programming autonomy anthropology of images human weighing-artificial intelligence blend divergence x personality newsstand flow break immediate seizure what these images say about us banking as an instrument to inform "reality" gallery file atlas mnemosine infinite images newspaper, magazine, poster, booklet (publication media) we influence the "aesthetics" of bots or bots influence us as a society, in the form of the media, as the public, and as the media, in the form of the media. The media is a tool of power, a tool of domination, a tool of control, and a tool of the public. The media is a tool of representation, a tool of information. The media is the instrument of the political, a tool of power. The media is the instrument of the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the instrument of the artistic, a tool of the public. The media is the instrument of the political, a tool of information. The media is the instrument of the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the instrument of the artistic, a tool of the public. The media is the instrument of the political, a tool of information. The media is the instrument of the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the instrument of the artistic, a tool of the public. The media is the political, a tool of information. The media is the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the artistic, a tool of the public. The media is the political, a tool of information. The media is the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the artistic, a tool of the public. The media is the political, a tool of information. The media is the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the political, a tool of information. The media is the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the artistic, a tool of the public. The media is the political, a tool of information. The media is the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the artistic, a tool of the public. The media is the political, a tool of information. The media is the scientific, a tool of the public. The media is the artistic, a tool of the public.

©2024 Lucidbeaming